New Framework Augments LLMs with Expert Knowledge for AI Agents

Researchers propose a software engineering framework for building AI agents that combines LLM capabilities with codified human expert domain knowledge for improved reliability.

New Framework Augments LLMs with Expert Knowledge for AI Agents

A new research paper from arXiv introduces a software engineering framework designed to enhance AI agent capabilities by systematically integrating codified human expert domain knowledge with large language models (LLMs). This approach addresses one of the most persistent challenges in building reliable AI agents: bridging the gap between general-purpose language model capabilities and specialized domain expertise.

The Problem with Pure LLM-Based Agents

While LLMs have demonstrated remarkable general reasoning abilities, their deployment as autonomous agents often reveals critical limitations. These models can hallucinate facts, misunderstand domain-specific constraints, and make decisions that violate expert-established best practices. In high-stakes applications—from video generation pipelines to synthetic media authentication systems—such errors can have significant consequences.

The research tackles this challenge by proposing a structured methodology for capturing, encoding, and integrating human expert knowledge into AI agent architectures. Rather than relying solely on an LLM's pre-trained knowledge or attempting to fine-tune models on domain-specific data, the framework creates a parallel knowledge layer that guides and constrains agent behavior.

Framework Architecture and Components

The proposed framework follows software engineering principles to create modular, maintainable AI agent systems. At its core, the architecture separates three key concerns:

Knowledge Codification Layer: This component provides structured representations of expert domain knowledge, including rules, constraints, decision trees, and procedural guidelines. Unlike the implicit knowledge embedded in LLM weights, this codified knowledge is explicit, auditable, and updatable without model retraining.

LLM Reasoning Engine: The language model serves as the primary reasoning and natural language interface component, handling interpretation of user inputs, generating plans, and producing human-readable outputs. However, its outputs are systematically validated against the codified knowledge base.

Integration Orchestrator: This middleware layer manages the interaction between the LLM and the knowledge layer, implementing validation checks, constraint enforcement, and fallback mechanisms when conflicts arise between model outputs and expert knowledge.

Technical Implementation Considerations

The framework emphasizes several software engineering best practices that make AI agents more reliable and maintainable. Separation of concerns ensures that domain knowledge can be updated independently of the underlying LLM, reducing the need for expensive model fine-tuning when requirements change.

Version control for knowledge bases enables tracking changes to expert rules over time, supporting rollback capabilities and audit trails essential for production deployments. This proves particularly valuable in regulated domains or applications requiring explainability.

The architecture also supports graceful degradation—when the LLM produces outputs that conflict with codified constraints, the system can either request clarification, apply automatic corrections, or escalate to human oversight rather than failing silently or producing invalid results.

Implications for Synthetic Media and Video AI

This framework holds particular relevance for AI systems operating in the synthetic media space. Video generation agents, deepfake detection systems, and content authentication tools all operate in domains with complex, evolving constraints that are difficult to capture through LLM training alone.

Consider an AI agent tasked with generating video content. Pure LLM-based approaches might produce technically competent outputs that nonetheless violate copyright guidelines, brand safety requirements, or content authenticity standards. By augmenting the generation agent with codified rules about permissible content, licensing constraints, and authenticity labeling requirements, the framework enables more reliable operation within real-world guardrails.

Similarly, detection systems for deepfakes and synthetic media can benefit from expert-codified knowledge about emerging manipulation techniques, platform-specific policies, and evidentiary standards for content verification. The framework's modular design allows these knowledge bases to be updated rapidly as new threats emerge, without waiting for model retraining cycles.

This research contributes to a growing body of work on hybrid AI architectures that combine neural network capabilities with symbolic reasoning and explicit knowledge representation. As AI agents take on more complex tasks—from scientific research to enterprise automation—the need for reliable, controllable, and explainable systems becomes increasingly critical.

The software engineering perspective offered by this framework provides practical guidance for teams building production AI agent systems. By treating domain knowledge as a first-class software artifact with its own lifecycle, testing requirements, and deployment considerations, organizations can achieve more predictable agent behavior while preserving the flexibility and natural language capabilities that make LLMs valuable.

For the AI video and synthetic media industry, such frameworks may prove essential as regulations around AI-generated content continue to evolve and the technical bar for reliable content authentication continues to rise.


Stay informed on AI video and digital authenticity. Follow Skrew AI News.