Model Raising vs Training: New AI Development Paradigm

A provocative new paper challenges the fundamental approach to AI development, arguing that the current paradigm of training models first and aligning them later is fundamentally flawed. The research proposes a shift from "model training" to "model raising" - developing AI systems with intrinsic identity and values from the ground up rather than attempting to correct behavior after the fact.

The Problem with Post-Hoc Alignment

Current AI development follows a two-stage process: first, large language models are trained on massive datasets to develop capabilities, then alignment techniques like reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) are applied to shape their behavior. The paper argues this approach is akin to raising a child without guidance and then attempting to instill values in adulthood - inefficient at best, futile at worst.

The researchers point out that this methodology creates models that develop their own implicit objectives during pre-training, which may conflict with the values imposed during alignment. This fundamental mismatch requires extensive correction efforts and can never fully resolve the tension between learned behaviors and desired outcomes.

Identity-Based Development

The proposed "model raising" paradigm centers on developing AI systems with intrinsic identity from the earliest stages of development. Rather than treating alignment as a post-processing step, values and constraints would be woven into the model's architecture and training process from inception.

This approach draws parallels to human development, where identity formation occurs continuously through interaction with environment and feedback, not as a sudden correction phase. The researchers argue that AI systems developed this way would exhibit more consistent, predictable behavior because their values aren't grafted on but are fundamental to their operation.

Implications for Synthetic Media and Deepfakes

For AI video generation and synthetic media, this paradigm shift carries significant implications. Current generative models often require extensive safety filters and content moderation layers applied after training - systems that can be brittle and inconsistent. Models "raised" with intrinsic understanding of content authenticity, consent, and ethical boundaries might produce more inherently trustworthy outputs.

The framework suggests that AI systems generating synthetic media could be developed with built-in awareness of attribution requirements, manipulation ethics, and authenticity standards. Rather than relying on external detection systems to identify problematic deepfakes, the generative models themselves could be designed with intrinsic constraints preventing certain types of harmful synthesis.

Technical Challenges and Open Questions

The paper acknowledges substantial technical challenges in implementing this vision. How do you encode identity and values at the architectural level? What training objectives and loss functions support intrinsic alignment? How can developers ensure that identity formation during training produces desired characteristics without emergent misalignment?

The researchers call for fundamental research into training methodologies that integrate value learning throughout the development process, rather than treating it as a separate optimization problem. This includes exploring novel architectures, training curricula, and evaluation frameworks that support identity-based development.

Toward a New Development Methodology

The paper proposes several concrete research directions: developing training datasets and objectives that encode values from the start, creating architectural innovations that support intrinsic constraints, and establishing evaluation frameworks that assess identity consistency throughout development rather than just final behavior.

For practitioners building AI systems, especially in sensitive domains like synthetic media generation, this work suggests rethinking the entire development pipeline. Rather than building maximally capable systems and constraining them afterward, the focus should shift to cultivating systems with desired characteristics as core features.

While the full realization of "model raising" remains a research challenge, the conceptual framework offers a compelling alternative to current practices. As AI systems become more powerful and their outputs more consequential - particularly in domains like video synthesis and digital media - developing models with intrinsic alignment rather than post-hoc correction may prove essential for creating trustworthy AI systems.

Stay informed on AI video and digital authenticity. Follow Skrew AI News.