Survey: AI Agent Architectures, Applications & Evaluation

A newly published survey paper provides a comprehensive examination of AI agent systems, mapping the landscape of architectures, applications, and evaluation methodologies that underpin today's most capable autonomous AI systems. This foundational research offers crucial insights into the building blocks that power everything from conversational assistants to content generation pipelines.

Understanding AI Agent Architectures

AI agents represent a paradigm shift from static models to dynamic, goal-oriented systems capable of perceiving their environment, making decisions, and taking actions autonomously. The survey systematically categorizes the architectural approaches that have emerged as the field has matured.

At the core of modern agent systems lies the integration of large language models (LLMs) as reasoning engines. These foundation models serve as the cognitive backbone, enabling agents to understand context, plan sequences of actions, and adapt to novel situations. The paper examines how different architectural choices—from simple prompt-based agents to complex multi-component systems—affect capability and reliability.

Key architectural patterns identified include:

ReAct-style architectures that interleave reasoning and action, allowing agents to think through problems step-by-step while interacting with external tools and APIs. This approach has proven particularly effective for complex tasks requiring multi-step planning.

Memory-augmented systems that maintain both short-term working memory and long-term knowledge stores, enabling agents to learn from past interactions and maintain context across extended sessions.

Multi-agent frameworks where specialized agents collaborate, each bringing domain expertise to solve problems beyond the capability of any single agent. This mirrors the compositional approach increasingly seen in synthetic media generation pipelines.

Applications Across Domains

The survey maps agent applications across numerous domains, revealing patterns relevant to content creation and authenticity verification. Agents are increasingly deployed in scenarios requiring nuanced judgment and multi-step reasoning—capabilities essential for both generating and detecting synthetic media.

In content generation workflows, agent systems orchestrate multiple models to produce coherent outputs. A video generation pipeline, for instance, might employ separate agents for script writing, scene planning, visual generation, and quality assessment. Understanding these architectures illuminates how synthetic content is created at scale.

For verification and authentication, agent architectures enable more sophisticated analysis than single-model approaches. An authenticity verification agent might coordinate facial analysis, audio forensics, and metadata examination, synthesizing evidence across modalities to reach conclusions about content provenance.

The paper also examines agents in software development, scientific research, and enterprise automation—domains where the same architectural principles apply. The cross-domain analysis reveals that successful agent design follows consistent patterns regardless of application area.

Evaluation Frameworks and Challenges

Perhaps the most valuable contribution is the survey's treatment of agent evaluation. As agents become more autonomous, measuring their capabilities—and limitations—becomes increasingly complex.

Traditional benchmarks measuring single-turn accuracy prove insufficient for agent systems that operate over extended interactions. The paper examines emerging evaluation approaches including:

Task completion metrics that assess whether agents achieve specified goals, accounting for the variety of valid paths to success. This is particularly relevant for creative tasks where multiple acceptable outputs exist.

Trajectory analysis examining not just final outcomes but the reasoning and action sequences agents employ. Understanding these trajectories is crucial for identifying failure modes and potential misuse.

Robustness testing that probes agent behavior under adversarial conditions, unexpected inputs, and edge cases. For agents involved in content authentication, robustness against attempts to fool the system is paramount.

Implications for Digital Authenticity

The architectural patterns and evaluation frameworks described have direct implications for the synthetic media landscape. As generative AI systems increasingly employ agent architectures for more sophisticated content creation, detection systems must evolve correspondingly.

Agent-based generation can produce content with greater coherence and contextual awareness than single-model approaches. A deepfake system using agent architecture might automatically adjust lighting, maintain temporal consistency, and handle edge cases that would trip simpler systems. Understanding these capabilities helps anticipate the sophistication of emerging synthetic media.

Conversely, agent architectures offer promising approaches for detection. Multi-agent verification systems can examine content from multiple angles, cross-reference findings, and reason about inconsistencies in ways that mirror human expert analysis.

The survey provides a technical foundation for understanding both sides of this evolving landscape, making it essential reading for anyone working at the intersection of AI capabilities and content authenticity.

Stay informed on AI video and digital authenticity. Follow Skrew AI News.